Kathrine`s Geschäfte mit Howard Mann u. die Estate-Klage gegen Howard Mann

[Christine3110]

haha...Mann bezeichnet Michael als einen Angestellten von Joe , weswegen dieser sämtliche Rechte über Michaels geistigem Eigentum besitze

[rip.michael]

... egal was H. Mann genommen hat, er sollte schnellstens sehen, dass er von diesem trip runterkommt!
Da hört sich doch alles auf!

[Christine3110]

Validity of Michael Jackson's will in dispute, lawsuit says


The validity of Michael Jackson’s will could get a court airing next month if a business associate of the pop star’s mother gets his way.

Wenn es nach dem Willen eines Geschäftspartners von Katherine Jackson geht, so wird die Gültigkeit von MJs Testament Bestandteil einer Anhörung sein.

Lawyers for a Canadian businessman who works with Katherine Jackson wrote in a filing Monday that he was “in possession of evidence that casts substantial doubt on the validity of the will” and wants to present it at federal trial set for September.

Anwälte des kanadischen Geschäftsmannes behaupten, dass er im Besitz von Beweisen sei, die berechtigte Zweifel an Gültigkeit des Testamentes belegen würden.

The business partner, Howard Mann, is locked in a copyright battle with the executors of the singer’s estate largely over a tribute book that he produced with Jackson’s mother.

In a filing in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, Mann’s lawyers wrote he wanted to present an attack on the will’s authenticity as part of a defense to copyright infringement claims brought by executors John Branca and John McClain.

In einem Antrag ans Gericht, schrieben Manns Anwälte, er wolle den Angriff auf die Rechmäßigkeit des Testamentes als Teil seiner Verteidigung gegen die Vorwürfe der Copyrightverletzungen vorbringen.

“Defendants will argue that the estate cannot produce any evidence indicating they own the assets, thereby failing the first prong of a copyright action,” the attorneys wrote.


The probate court presiding over Jackson’s estate accepted the 2002 will shortly after his death and an appellate court subsequently said the window for challenging the will had closed. The document put Jackson’s assets into a private trust run by Branca and McClain, music industry veterans and longtime Jackson advisors. The trust benefits Jackson’s three children, his mother and charities.

In recent weeks, some of his siblings, who inherited nothing, have said the will was faked and called on Branca and McClain to resign. The executors have condemned “false and defamatory accusations grounded in stale Internet conspiracy theories.”

Vor einigen Wochen, hatten einige von MJs Geschwistern, die nichts vererbt bekommen hatten, gesagt, das Testament sei gefaked und forderten Branca u. McClain auf, zurückzutreten.

Their attorney urged a judge last month to bar any attack on the will in front of jurors, writing that it was a settled legal issue and irrelevant to the copyright claims.

“None of this evidence would constitute a legal defense to any of the claims in this lawsuit, and are offered solely so that defendants may point to their relationship with Mrs. Jackson and argue that the estate is somehow being unfair to her,” the attorney wrote.

Der Anwalt für das Estate bat den Richter letzten Monat jegliche Attacke gegen das Testament vor den Juroren zu unterbinden, da es rechtlich bestätigt wurde und irrelevant für die Copyrightklage sei.

A hearing is set for Aug. 27.




(Nachtigall ick hör dir tapsen)

[Dreamerdancer]

Da soll mal einer noch sagen, Branca verdient sein Geld durch seine Estate Arbeit mit nix tun oder so nebenbei.

[Christine3110]

Tja, bei Gott.
Ich find es nur traurig, dass sich keiner von jenen , in einer anderen Sache so engagierten Fans, mal für sowas interessiert.
Dabei ist dieser Prozeß so wichtig!

[Lena]

We are still waiting for the summary judgement. I will update about the motions filed this monday


Estate has filed a motion for "TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANTS FROM INTRODUCING EVIDENCE THAT (1) MICHAEL JACKSON’S WILL WAS FORGED OR INVALID; (2) THE EXECUTORS WERE NOT PROPERLY APPOINTED BY THE COURT AND (3) ARE NOT PROPERLY DISCHARGING THEIR DUTIES OR SHOULD BE REMOVED"


Estate said that they believed Mann would argue that Estate cannot bring the claims in the lawsuit against Mann/ Vaccaro because "the Executors lack standing to bring these claims because


(a) they are not the duly authorized Executors or because Michael Jackson’s Will is somehow invalid"


(b) that even if Messrs. Branca and McClain are the properly court-appointed Executors, there is some legal basis to challenge their authority in this proceeding, either by certain Jackson Family members or Defendants,


(c) that Mr. Mann’s misconduct is somehow excused or mitigated because the Executors are allegedly not properly providing for Katherine Jackson, Michael Jackson’s mother and a life estate beneficiary of the Estate, and


(d) that Defendants’ conduct should be mitigated or excused because they are in business with or are sharing profits from their ill-gotten gains with Mrs. Jackson.


Estate's response simply said
- Branca & McClain has been appointed as Executors by the probate court
- Will's validity, legitimacy of Executors and Katherine's partnership with Mann was irrelevant to this lawsuit.
- Mann / Vaccaro doesn't have the legal standing to challenge the will
- Katherine is a beneficiary and is not empowered to act on behalf of the Estate or make contracts involving Estate assets.
- None of what Mann / Vaccaro claims can be defense against an intellectual property lawsuit.


Two direct quotes from MJ Estate


"First, the Los Angeles Superior Court has exclusive jurisdiction over Michael Jackson’s Estate, including the determinations of whether to admit the Will and whom to appoint as the Estate’s executors. Any challenge to the Will is proper only in the Probate proceedings. Whether Defendants like it or not, John Branca and John McClain are the court-appointed Executors, with full authority to prosecute this action"


and


"If admitted, Defendants’ evidence would of course require Plaintiffs to respond by establishing the validity of the Will, the details of the substantial support provided to Katherine Jackson and the full, indeed exemplary, performance of the Executors in preserving and substantially enhancing the quality and value of the Estate and its assets."


Mann / Vaccaro responds to this saying that


"Defendants do not intend to use such evidence to seek an order invalidating the will or removing the executors. Rather, the evidence will be used to put the Estate to its proof to establish that it owns the subject property."


So Mann / Vaccaro says that they'll mention the will and trust to question if Michael owned the assets and if they transferred to his Estate after his death.


Finishes it by saying "Moreover, the Defendants are in possession of evidence that casts substantial doubt on the validity of the will."


Mann / Vaccaro mentions that Katherine is their partner, the main product is the book (and a documentary plan) and the website is to sell Katherine's book and therefore the relationship between Katherine and Estate is relevant.


Mann continues to say "Katherine Jackson,the primary beneficiary of the Estate, has a real and pressing need for funds." and "Katherine Jackson entered into the partnership with Howard Mann and why the partnership is fair, reasonable and in the economic interest of Katherine Jackson. The partnership is not the result of some devious underhanded conduct of Howard Mann as the Estate suggests"


Mann says he needs this info to defend himself against the character attacks.


Mann also responded to MJ's Estate's other motions. If you remember I had said the following before


"On July 30 Estate has filed a request to deny Mann and Vaccaro introducing an expert witness. According to the Estate although the name and the CV of the expert witness has been forwarded to them, they weren't sent any written report from this expert witness. As the rules require a "written report", Estate is asking barring of Mann/ Vaccaro's expert witness Moses Avalon."


Mann / Vaccaro responded saying "Defendants hereby submit this written statement declaring that they will not oppose Plaintiffs’ July 30th, 2012, Motion In Limine To Preclude Defendants From Introducing Expert Testimony."


I had also said


Estate is also asking the court not to allow Mann / Vaccaro to present versions of their website as they failed to preserve the website (edited it) and never provided a copy of the website even though they were asked.


Mann / Vaccaro is arguing that as the placement of Thriller 25 on their website had happened prior to the lawsuit and as Estate has not clearly asked for every version of the website to be saved before they should be able to use the website evidence as it's available.


Now some dates


- We are still waiting for judge's decision on the partial summary judgement
- August 13, is the day that both sides will file Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law, Joint Witness List and Joint Exhibit list
- August 21, is the day to lodge Final Pretrial Conference Order
- August 27 is the day for the final hearing that the judge will decide on the above 3 motions , the expert witness, the website and will & executors.
- September 4 is the trial start.

Quelle: Ivy, MJJC


Im Vortext noch eine Zusammenfasung von Anträgen und Gegenanträgen zu Mann`s leztzter Einreichung bzgl. Testament (siehe auch Post 155). Hierzu wird wie zu einigen Anträgen seitens des Estate (Nicht-Zulassung eines Zeugen und der Webseiten-Präsentation, Themen auch schon im Post 152 erwähnt bei der Anhöurng am 27. August entschieden). Ach ja recht witzig wie Mann so argumentiert. Estate sorgt nicht angemessen für Kathrine und daher braucht sie zusätzliche Einkünfte und Kathrine schloss die Partnerschaft mit Mann, daher ist sie fair und im besten finanz. Interesse von Mrs. Jackson.


Die nächsten wichtigen Daten:
Wir warten immer noch auf Entscheidung bzgl. teilweise summary judgement
13. August ist der Tag wo beide Seiten ihr Memorandum bzgl. Fakten und Recht, die Zeugenliste und Beweisliste vorlegen müssen
21. August ist der Tag um den Antrag zur letzten Vor-Prozess-Konferenz-Antrag einzureichen
27. August ist der Tag der letzten mündlichen Anhörung wo der Richter über die letzten Anträge entscheidet (" sachverständigen Zeugen, die Webseite und Testament u. Verwalter")
4. September Prozessbeginn

[Christine3110]

Mann continues to say "Katherine Jackson,the primary beneficiary of the Estate, has a real and pressing need for funds." and "Katherine Jackson entered into the partnership with Howard Mann and why the partnership is fair, reasonable and in the economic interest of Katherine Jackson. The partnership is not the result of some devious underhanded conduct of Howard Mann as the Estate suggests"

ich bin sicher demnächst wird dieser Idiot heiliggesprochen

Ist schon edel von ihm Katherine 25 % von seinen Einkünften abzugeben, die er mit/in ihrem Namen macht.

[Dreamerdancer]

Das ist ja der Knaller: Estate sorgt nicht angemessen für Kathrine und daher braucht sie zusätzliche Einkünfte und Kathrine schloss die Partnerschaft mit Mann, daher ist sie fair und im besten finanz. Interesse von Mrs. Jackson.
Hoffentlich brät ihm Branca so richtig eine drüber.

[Lena]

Bin dann mal gespannt auf die endgültige Zeugenliste, die wir nächste Woche erhalten.

Die ursprüngliche Zeugenliste von H. Mann las sich so:

Dr. Tohme,
Katherine and Joseph Jackson,
Alle Jackson-Geschwister
Henry Vaccaro,
Joel Katz,
Al Malnic,
Dieter Wiesner
Brian Oxman,
Adam Streisand,
Longdell MacMillan (aka. Londell McMillan)
Randy Phillips

[Christine3110]

Judge rules website violated Jackson copyrights

ANTHONY McCARTNEY | August 10, 2012 03:06 PM EST | AP
Compare other versions »

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has ruled that a website and businessman working with Michael Jackson's mother has violated some of the singer's copyrights and should be blocked from future uses of the works.

The estate sued Mann in January 2011, claiming he was violating copyrights and posed unfair competition to Jackson's estate. Pregerson ruled that the website improperly used art from the film "This Is It," a logo featuring Jackson and the song "Destiny," as well as other material.

A phone message for Mann's attorney was not immediately returned Friday. Mann has collaborated with Katherine Jackson, who is a beneficiary of the singer's estate.

The ruling does not address damages.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120810/us-jackson-estate/

Ein Bundesrichter hat entschieden, dass die Webseite u. der Geschäftsmann, der mit MJs Mutter zusammenarbeitet, einige Copyrights des Sängers verletzt hat u. diese für zukünftige Nutzung geblockt werden soll .

In der richterlichen Entscheidung wurden keine Schadensersatzzahlungen genannt.

[Lena]

Super ein voller Sieg im teilweise summary-judgement für den Estate

Hier ein paar weitere Info`s. Von unten nach oben lesen.

Just like that Mann/Vaccaro assets has become useless With judge establishing Estate's IP rights, they can't be used without approval
Damit ist der Mann / Vaccaro-Besitz nutzlos geworden Richter bestätigt die Estate IP-Rechte, sie können nicht ohne deren Genehmigung verwendet werden


Court issues a PERMANENT injunction
Gericht verhing eine dauerhafte einstweilige Verfügung


Öffnen
Antworten Retweeten Favorisieren
2m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Judge says Mann/ Vaccaro acted in bad faith to profit from Michael's name by registering multiple domain names with Michael or MJ
Richter sagt Mann / Vaccaro haben in böser Absicht gehandelt hat, um aus Michaels Name durch die Registrierung mehrerer Domain-Namen mit Michael oder MJ zu profitieren


Öffnen
Antworten Retweeten Favorisieren
3m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Judge says Mann / Vaccaro has used MJ's likeliness in their logo and advertising without permission of the Estate.
Richter sagt Mann / Vaccaro hat MJ`s Bildnis in ihrem Logo und Werbung ohne Zustimmung des Estates verwendet


Öffnen
Antworten Retweeten Favorisieren
4m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Judge says MJ has unparalleled recognition among public, Mann's logo is MJ's dance pose and sell MJ related products.
Richter sagt MJ hat beispiellose Anerkennung beim Publikum, Manns Logo ist MJ`s Tanzpose und er verkauft MJ-bezogene Produkte



8m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Judge says 2004 lawsuit only protects Vaccaro from a past misconduct and not the current misconduct.
Gericht sagt die 2004-Klage schützt Vaccaro nur von einem vergangen Fehlverhalten aber nicht vor derzeitigem Fehlverhalten

Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Judge says none of the claims in 2004 lawsuit was litigated or decided and just bc MJ didn't pursue it doesn't mean they got the ownership
Richter sagt, keine der Forderungen aus der 2004 Klage wurde im Prozess entschieden und nur weil MJ die Klage nicht weiter verfolgte, bedeutet das das sie nun im Besitz des Eigentums sind


Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Judge says regardless the MJ's IP rights weren't on bankruptcy assets and bankruptcy sale did not include them.
Richter sagt, unabhängig davon waren MJ`s IP-Rechte nicht Bestandteil der Konkursmasse und sie waren nicht im Konkursverkauf enthalten.


Öffnen
Antworten Retweeten Favorisieren
1m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Judge says Katherine & Joe's statements given to Mann doesn't have a value as they can't explain how they came to own the assets
Richter sagt Katherine & Joe 's Aussagen an Mann gegeben haben keinen Wert, da sie nicht erklären können wie sie in den Besitz der Werte kamen


Öffnen
Antworten Retweeten Favorisieren
2m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Court says Ed Pease's statement that MJ worker "very likely" as work for hire is just a speculation.
Gericht sagt Ed Pease Aussage, dass MJ Arbeiter "work for hire" war ist nur eine Spekulation.


Öffnen
Antworten Retweeten Favorisieren
6m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
This is a huge win for MJ Estate
Dies ist ein großer Gewinn für MJ-Estate
Öffnen
Antworten Retweeten Favorisieren
7m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Court agrees that bankruptcy sale did not transfer any rights, title, or interest to Michael Jackson’s intellectual property.
Gericht stimmt zu, dass der Konkurs-Verkauf nicht übertragen hat die Rechte, Titel oder Interessen an geistigem Eigentum von Michael Jackson.
Öffnen
Antworten Retweeten Favorisieren
8m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Judge grants Estate's partial summary judgement request as well as for unfair competition and an accounting;
Richter garantiert Estate teilweise Zusammenfassungsurteil- Anfrage sowie die Anfrage wegen unlauteren Wettbewerbs und der Buchhaltungsoffenlegung


Öffnen
Antworten Retweeten Favorisieren
9m Ivy @Ivy_MJJC
Judge says Mann / Vaccaro has violated MJ's copyrights in “This Is It” key art, “Destiny” song, and “Thriller”
Richter sagt Mann / Vaccaro hat MJ Urheberrechte an "This Is It", "Destiny"-Song, und "Thriller" verletzt


Edit:
Und die Gerichtsdokumente
http://www.scribd.com/doc/102574251/...mary-Judgement

[Dreamerdancer]

Branca kann stolz auf sich sein, ist das endgültig ,oder kommt da noch was ?

[Christine3110]

Das war nur die 1. Runde. Am 27. Aug. und 4. Sept. gehts weiter.


...sieht so aus, als müsse er demnächst wieder auf die Pornoproduktion umsteigen.

[Lena]

Michael Jackson Estate Scores a Major Win in Court
Michael Jackson Estate erzielt großen Sieg im Gericht
http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/08/10...r-win-in-court

The Michael Jackson estate has won a major victory in court. The executors have triumphed over Howard Mann, the Canadian business man who published a book of photos with Katherine Jackson without the estate’s permission. Mann also purchased a boatload of souvenirs and Jackson family memorabilia from a warehouse owner in New Jersey. Among the items were tapes of music by Michael Jackson. Mann claimed ownership of the copyrights of those tapes even released a song from the collection. Now, with a summary judgment, the court has ruled against Mann. He’ll have to shut down his Jackson websites, especially the one selling the book of photos. Mann took a bath on that book, too. He has cartons and cartons of them somewhere. More to come…
also read this, when I first reported what was going on:

http://www.showbiz411.com/2010/11/07/tmz-jackson-secret-vault-back-off-their-new-song

Here’s a statement from Howard Weitzman:
Statement von Howard Weitzmann:
A Federal Court Judge ruled today that Howard Mann cannot exploit intellectual property created by the late Michael Jackson, including trademarks, copyrights, name, likeness and image.
Ein Bundesrichter entschied heute, dass Howard Mann nicht das geistige Eigentum von dem verstorbenen Michael Jackson ausbeuten kann, einschließlich von Marken, Urheberrechte, Name und Bild.
These assets are owned by the late singer’s Estate for the benefit of his children and mother. The Court found that Mann and his entities improperly claimed to own the assets, and intended in bad faith to profit from them using his various websites. Zia Modabber, one of the lawyers who represents the Estate in this matter states “The Court’s ruling makes clear that Howard Mann had no right to use Michael Jackson’s intellectual property for his own benefit.” The Court ruled that Mann and his entities in fact do not own any of Michael Jackson’s intellectual property and should be permanently enjoined from unlawfully using Michael Jackson’s intellectual property in the future.
Diese Vermögenswerte sind im Besitz des Nachlasses des verstorbenen Sängers zum Wohle seiner Kinder und Mutter. Das Gericht stellte fest, dass Mann und seine Einheiten zu Unrecht beansprucht haben das Vermögen zu besitzen, um in böser Absicht und mit Hilfe seiner verschiedenen Websites davon zu profitieren. Zia Modabber, einer der Anwälte, der den Estate in dieser Angelegenheit vertritt stellt fest: "Das Urteil des Gerichtes macht deutlich, dass Howard Mann kein Recht hat das geistige Eigentum von Michael Jackson zu seinem eigenen Nutzen zu verwenden." Das Gericht entschied, dass Mann und seine Einheiten in der Tat nicht Eigentümer des geistigen Eigentums von Michael Jackson sind und ihnen wurde dauerhaft untersagt unrechtmäßig Michael Jacksons Eigentums zu verwenden.

Howard Weitzman, a lawyer for the Estate indicated that “The Court’s ruling means that a trial set for September 4, 2012 will involve how much in damages the Michael Jackson Estate is entitled to collect from Mann and his various entities.” The Executors of the Michael Jackson Estate are extremely pleased with the Court’s ruling which prevents Mann from continuing to unlawfully profit from Michael Jackson and his intellectual property.
Howard Weitzman, Anwalt für den Estate hat darauf hingewiesen, dass "Das Urteil des Gerichtes bedeutet, dass der Prozess, der für den 4. September 2012 angesetzt ist festellen wird wie viel Schadensersatz der Michael Jackson Estate berechtigt ist zu erhalten von Mann und seinen verschiedenen Einrichtungen." Die Verwalter des Michael Jackson Estates sind äußerst zufrieden mit dem Urteil des Gerichtshofs das Mann daran hindert, weiterhin unrechtmäßig von Michael Jackson und seinem geistigen Eigentum zu profitieren.

[Lena]

Judge: Michael Jackson's mother can't profit from merchandise line
Richter: Michael Jackson`s Mutter kann nicht von Merchandaise-Linie profitieren
August 10, 2012 | 1:44 pm
A federal judge rejected a novel legal argument Friday that would have allowed Michael Jackson's mother and her business partner to profit from a line of merchandise separate from the late star's estate.

In a 15-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Dean D. Pregerson granted summary judgment in a copyright-infringement case brought by the executors of Jackson's estate and issued a permanent injunction barring Canadian entrepreneur Howard Mann from trading on the singer's name.
In einem 25-seitigen Urteil hat der U.S. District-Richter Pregerson ein zusammenfassendes Urteil in einem Fall wegen Copyright-Verletzungen eingebracht vom MJ-Estate gefällt und eine dauerhafte Verfügung verhängt, die den canad. Unternehmer H. Mann den Handel mit Namen des Sängers untersagt.
"There is undisputed evidence that Defendants intended in bad faith to profit from use of Jackson’s name, by registering multiple domain names containing his name or the initials 'MJ' to sell Jackson-related products," the judge wrote.
"Es gibt unbestritten Beweise dafür, dass die Beklagten in böser Absicht auf Profit durch die Verwendung von Jacksons Namen aus waren, durch die Registrierung mehrerer Domain-Namen, die seinen Namen oder den Initialen" MJ " um Jackson-bezogenen Produkte zu verkaufen", schrieb der Richter.

Mann and Jackson's mother, Katherine, collaborated on a coffee table book and calendar that were sold without the estate's authorization. The 82-year-old Jackson family matriarch received a cut of the profits and other money amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars, Mann told The Times in 2010. Katherine Jackson said then that she needed the money and wanted estate executors John Branca and John McClain to "leave Howard alone."
Mann und Jacksons Mutter Katherine haben gemeinsam an einem Bildband und Kalender collaboriert die ohne Genehmigung des Estates verkauft wurden. Die 82-jährige Jackson-Familie Matriarchin erhielt einen Anteil an den Gewinnen und anderes Geld in Höhe von Hunderten von Tausenden von Dollar, sagte Manns der Times im Jahr 2010. Katherine Jackson sagte dann, dass sie das Geld brauche und wollte das die Nachlassverwalter John Branca und John McClain "Howard in Ruhe lassen."

Mann's lawyers had argued in court papers that his company, Vintage Pop, was forever immunized against lawsuits accusing it of exploiting Michael Jackson's intellectual property because of a ruling in a 2004 suit by the singer. Jackson had sued Vintage Pop for copyright infringement and other claims, but then refused to submit to a deposition and stopped paying his lawyers. A judge dismissed the case in 2006 "with prejudice" -- meaning Jackson couldn't bring the same claims against Vintage Pop again.

But in his ruling Pregerson wrote that the executors could sue Vintage Pop if their allegations were completely different than the ones Jackson made in the abandoned lawsuit.

"(A)ll of the misconduct alleged in this suit took place long after the 2004 action, and the claims from the two suits therefore do not arise from the same transactional nucleus of facts," the judge wrote.

A spokesman for the executors said in a statement that they were "extremely pleased with the Court's ruling," and noted that Michael Jackson's intellectual property is "owned by the late singer's Estate for the benefit of his children and mother."

The relationship between the Jackson family and the estate has been contentious, with three of the star's siblings claiming that the executors derive their power from a fraudulent will.

Mann's lawyers said they wanted to raise questions about the validity of the will at the trial, but estate lawyer Howard Weitzman said in a statement that the judge's ruling means that a planned September proceeding will focus on determining the financial damages sustained by the estate.

Mann did not immediately return a message seeking comment.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/08/michael-jackson-mother-cant-profit-merchandise-line.html